Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://sgc.anlis.gob.ar/handle/123456789/2476
Title: | Modelling diagnostics for Echinococcus granulosus surveillance in sheep using Latent Class Analysis: Argentina as a case study | Authors: | Sykes, Abagael L Larrieu, Edmundo Poggio, Thelma Verónica Céspedes, Graciela Mujica, Guillermo B Basáñez, Maria-Gloria Prada, Joaquin M |
Keywords: | Teorema de Bayes;Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática;Argentina | Issue Date: | Jun-2022 | Journal: | One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) | Abstract: | Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato is a globally prevalent zoonotic parasitic cestode leading to cystic echinococcosis (CE) in both humans and sheep with both medical and financial impacts, whose reduction requires the application of a One Health approach to its control. Regarding the animal health component of this approach, lack of accurate and practical diagnostics in livestock impedes the assessment of disease burden and the implementation and evaluation of control strategies. We use of a Bayesian Latent Class Analysis (LCA) model to estimate ovine CE prevalence in sheep samples from the Río Negro province of Argentina accounting for uncertainty in the diagnostics. We use model outputs to evaluate the performance of a novel recombinant B8/2 antigen B subunit (rEgAgB8/2) indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting E. granulosus in sheep. Necropsy (as a partial gold standard), western blot (WB) and ELISA diagnostic data were collected from 79 sheep within two Río Negro slaughterhouses, and used to estimate individual infection status (assigned as a latent variable within the model). Using the model outputs, the performance of the novel ELISA at both individual and flock levels was evaluated, respectively, using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and simulating a range of sample sizes and prevalence levels within hypothetical flocks. The estimated (mean) prevalence of ovine CE was 27.5% (95%Bayesian credible interval (95%BCI): 13.8%-58.9%) within the sample population. At the individual level, the ELISA had a mean sensitivity and specificity of 55% (95%BCI: 46%-68%) and 68% (95%BCI: 63%-92%), respectively, at an optimal optical density (OD) threshold of 0.378. At the flock level, the ELISA had an 80% probability of correctly classifying infection at an optimal cut-off threshold of 0.496. These results suggest that the novel ELISA could play a useful role as a flock-level diagnostic for CE surveillance in the region, supplementing surveillance activities in the human population and thus strengthening a One Health approach. Importantly, selection of ELISA cut-off threshold values must be tailored according to the epidemiological situation. |
Description: | Fil: Sykes, Abagael L. London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research and MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London; United Kingdom Fil: Larrieu, Edmundo. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, General Pico; Argentina Fil: Poggio, Thelma Verónica. Escuela de Veterinaria, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Choele Choel; Argentina Fil: Céspedes, M Graciela. Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología César Milstein (CONICET); Buenos Aires, Argentina Fil: Mujica, Guillermo B. Ministerio de Salud, Provincia de Río Negro, Viedma; Argentina Fil: Basáñez, Maria-Gloria. London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research and MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London; United Kingdom Fil: Prada, Joaquin M. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom |
URI: | http://sgc.anlis.gob.ar/handle/123456789/2476 | ISSN: | 2352-7714 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100359 |
Appears in Collections: | Artículos |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S2352340922005017-main.pdf | Artículo en inglés | 756.86 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
68
checked on Dec 30, 2024
Download(s)
8
checked on Dec 30, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.