Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://sgc.anlis.gob.ar/handle/123456789/2659
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVargas, Paolaes
dc.contributor.authorKrolewiecki, Alejandro J.es
dc.contributor.authorEchazú, Adrianaes
dc.contributor.authorJuarez, Marisaes
dc.contributor.authorCajal, Pamela S.es
dc.contributor.authorGil, José Fernandoes
dc.contributor.authorCaro, Nicolases
dc.contributor.authorNasser, Julio R.es
dc.contributor.authorLammie, Patrickes
dc.contributor.authorCimino, Rubén Oscares
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-07T16:59:34Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-07T16:59:34Z-
dc.date.issued2017-04-10-
dc.identifier.urihttp://sgc.anlis.gob.ar/handle/123456789/2659-
dc.description.abstractNorthwestern Argentina is endemic for soil-transmitted helminths, and annual deworming programs are carried out in prioritized areas. High prevalence of Strongyloides stercoralis was reported in this area; therefore, control programs including ivermectin are being evaluated. The NIE-enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used for this purpose. In this community trial, two groups of patients, classified according to housing and living conditions were evaluated. Simultaneous with baseline survey, Group 1 was moved to new households with access to improved water and sanitation facilities (W and S), where deworming (MDA, massive drug administration) took place within 1 month; whereas Group 2 received MDA but remained living with unimproved W and S. The mean time interval between baseline and the follow-up was 331 days for Group 1 and 508 for Group 2. Anti-NIE levels were measured for each individual before and after interventions and follow-up optical density (OD) ratios were calculated to quantify the variation. A significant decrease of the anti-NIE levels between baseline and follow-up was observed in both groups. Nonetheless, the number of patients that achieved the cure criteria (OD ratio < 0.6) was higher in Group 1 than Group 2 with values of 72.7% (24/33) and 45.0% (18/40), respectively (P = 0.0197). Our results support the conclusion that a combined intervention including deworming and improvements in life conditions is more effective, in terms of the proportion of subjects cured than deworming alone. Furthermore, we found that NIE-ELISA is a useful test for assessing the response to treatment and to evaluate the outcome of control intervention programs.es
dc.language.isoen_USes
dc.publisherThe American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygienees
dc.relation.ispartofAm. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 97(1), 2017, pp. 166–172es
dc.titleSerologic Monitoring of Public Health Interventions against Strongyloides stercoralises
dc.typeArtículoes
dc.identifier.doi10.4269/ajtmh.16-0857-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeArtículo-
Appears in Collections:Parasitosis intestinales en Argentina
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
06. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 97(1), 2017, pp. 166–172.pdf326.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

3
checked on Aug 13, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.